Drug testing for welfare recipients essay help
Drug testing welfare recipients
Essays may be lightly modified for readability or to protect the anonymity of contributors, but we do not edit essay examples prior to publication. The controversy of how many welfare recipients tested for substance abuse has been proven to be skewed. However, those who support the law note that its intended purpose is to ensure that taxpayer money is not being squandered on people who only plan to abuse this assistance At initial thought it seemed like a grand idea and a great way to cut costs and to eliminate all the drug users in the system, and because of that welfare drug testing has been put into action in 13 states. For more information on choosing credible sources for your paper, check out this blog post. In order for our economy to thrive like it once did, there needs to be a strict monitoring on welfare program spending to not only better our economy, but the citizens in it. Last year, Utah Republicans passed and enacted a law that mandated drug testing for welfare recipients. The main topic of tax money is the use of assistance money and are the recipients really using the money for the right reasons. With those recipients who do pass the drug testing, there is no harm done. It is a subject that continues to be discussed within our peer groups, our communities, and our states. The goal of drug testing welfare recipients is not to revoke their privileges, it is simply to reform the system of welfare and make sure that those who truly need assistance are having their needs met. The state of Kentucky, among others, have considered following this trend.
Last year, Utah Republicans passed and enacted a law that mandated drug testing for welfare recipients. We should provide assistance on the basis of a return obligation.
A simple drug test should be administered to welfare recipients if they expect to receive the benefits that are offered to them. Taxpayers deserve to know that their hard-earned dollars are used wisely and not funding drug use for welfare recipients.
We'll take a look right away. InMichigan was the first state to implement a suspicionless drug testing policy as a condition for receiving welfare benefits.
Is evidence for or against drug testing welfare recipients
When this issue was appointed to a panel of judges, they summarized a quote from case of Dolan v. Many people today are arguing whether this move towards making drug testing a requirement to receive welfare benefits is unjust or not. Welfare assistance should not be a one-way handout or open-ended privilege. However, testing would only cost approximately twenty-five to thirty-five dollars per recipient. However, in many not all jobs, in order to apply for certain positions, a drug test is administered, although that is hardly ever looked at as unconstitutional when corporate leaders are held accountable for their actions when accepting public funds. They're not intended to be submitted as your own work, so we don't waste time removing every error. There's a problem with this paper. Strong evidence exists, asserting that the practice of administering drug testing to welfare recipients will cost the U. Last year, Utah Republicans passed and enacted a law that mandated drug testing for welfare recipients. The government then budgets for the funds to go towards programs such as welfare.
It is a subject that continues to be discussed within our peer groups, our communities, and our states. There are many factors that could effect this, but the main component that strips America of its sense of work ethic is the welfare system.
Drug testing for welfare recipients essay help
You know how looking at a math problem similar to the one you're stuck on can help you get unstuck? If the working class has to take a drug tests to obtain employment and pay taxes, why does someone receiving government money, not have too? Most positions in the working class require a drug test to be administered. Johnson, in response to the poverty rate being around 19 percent. If test results are negative for drug use, the welfare applicant is fully reimbursed. It was an argument that flooded social media, arguments filling comments with opinions. Those taxes go to the government. The reason that the War on Poverty faces such criticisms is because it was enacted during a time period when the poverty line had just risen, rather than fallen, leading critics to believe that it was only delivered to pass welfare programs.
Wurman 2. Rector, R.
With all of the advancements made from entrepreneurs, the misspending of government funds is only taking back a step in society that entrepreneurship took. Benefits of Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients Essay - Introduction Random drug screening involves the experimental analysis that utilizes specimens such as saliva, hair, blood or urine in order to determine the presence of certain drugs or their metabolites.
Drug testing welfare recipients benefits
The Salt Lake Tribune, Drug screening of welfare applicants is a mixed bag. Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients Essay - The history of social welfare can be traced back to ancient times, but the time most influential to the start of social welfare programs in the United States occurred during the great depression. Those taxes go to the government. The big question is, is it a problem within the welfare system? While there are many unemployed Americans who do everything in their power to find a job, there are also several who abuse the system. The consequence should be the same; a failed drug test; no check. Supporters of this and similar legislation have proposed that applicants for welfare pay for the drug testing themselves. Some people say that this is a violation of their personal rights. If the working class has to take a drug tests to obtain employment and pay taxes, why does someone receiving government money, not have too? This argument is based on the fourth amendment which states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
based on 111 review